energy efficiency stogger LED vs HPS SON-T
Stogger led compared to Hps son-t
In turf lighting practice the distribution of assimilation light within the grass growlight market is one of the most discussed issues. Since lighting costs, and thus energy, do not seem to stop increasing, an efficient use of assimilation light is of considerable importance for fieldmanagers. Many suppliers still use HPS SON-T. We focus at applying MechaTronix LED growlights. Why did we made this decision?
Stogger LED |
---|
Morphologic faster rooting and stronger vegetative growth |
Higher light level possible, shorter treatment |
Early season light treatment start possible |
Initial investment payback period < 3 years |
Energy efficient. Limited main connection necessary |
70% light efficiency |
Energy efficiency of 3.5 µmol/J |
10 years warranty, maintenance free |
Excellent even light distribution for homogenic growth |
State-of-the-art technology; changeable led engines |
Dynamic lighting: soft start/stop, like the sun |
HPS SON-T |
---|
Turf morphology not steerable by spectrum |
Higher light level not possible, because of tipburn |
Limited initial investment |
Requires industrial main connection & feed lines |
35% light efficiency |
Energy efficiency of 2.1 µmol/J |
Replace lamps every 3 years, maintenance required |
Less effective optics; more uneven light distribution |
End of life technology |
Static lighting: on/off |
Creates a lot of heat: high inefficiency and risk of tipburn |
10 year LED warranty
We designed our Booster growlight solutions with more than just another plain and simpel LED solution. Instead we use the MechaTronix Coolstack®, with a market leading efficiency up to 3.6µmol/J, as it is a state-of-the-art growlight platform with an unprecedented level of technology and vision in it. For example, we equip our Booster's with the first sustainable LED grow light on the market. With a 10 year warranty and LED life time of 75.000 lighting hours this stand equivalent to 20 years of use at a yearly rate of 3.600 hours of deployment. Of course in that time the technology and efficiency of LED grow lights will drastically change and improve, and your energy cost is one of the major aspects.
Therefore, the CoolStack® is designed in such a way that the LED growlight engines can be replaced and updated over time.
Did you know that the LED engines only count for 35% of the total cost of a growlight, and that the expectations are that this percentage will further decline over time when the LEDs become cheaper?
So why would you throw away 100% of a LED fixture after your warranty period when you want to upgrade to the next level of market efficiency in growlights while you could do that with just a small re-investment?
This is how we contribute, not only in your current investment, but also securing your sustainable and eco-friendly future.
Learn more
Why not use HPS SON-T?
While the efficiency and technology of HPS SON-T grow lights has stabilized over years, the efficiency of LED growlights moves up every year. Just a few years ago we could still discuss if LED growlights would offer a major advantage over the well-known and proven, but very limited lifetime technology of HPS SON-T lamps.
Today it is clear that the future of turf assimilation lighting has completely turned in the direction of LED technology. The most important cost driver of any grass grow solution is energy efficiency. Due to it's proven track-record, the only way to go is a LED powered solution. The cost savings make sure that within 2 years a LED system is cheaper than HPS SON-T.
In turf lighting practice the distribution of assimilation light within the grass growlight market is one of the most discussed issues. Since lighting costs, and thus energy, do not seem to stop increasing, an efficient use of assimilation light is of considerable importance for fieldmanagers. Many suppliers still use HPS SON-T. We focus at applying Mechatronix LED grow lights. Why did we made this decision?
Learn more about retrofitting to LED